SkipNavigation
sports_sj_news
;section=news;sport=sj;area=sports;pos=1;tile=1;sz=728x90
logo
My Shortcuts
United States' Jessica Jerome takes off during the first round of the ladies' Nordic combined ski U.S. Nationals on Sunday, March 16, 2008, at Utah Olympic Park in Park City, Utah. Jerome won.<br>
Douglas C. Pizac/The Associated Press

Women's ski jump advocate: 'It's not over'

CTVOlympics.ca
By Jennifer Lukas, CTVOlympics.ca Posted Saturday, July 11, 2009 6:33 PM ET

A women's ski jump advocate says ski jumpers and their lawyers will begin discussions on Monday over whether they will appeal a B.C. Supreme Court's decision to dismiss the lawsuit that many had hoped would end in a women's ski jump event at 2010 Olympic Winter Games.

"It's not over until it's over and we still have to discuss whether we will appeal or not," said Deedee Corradini, president of Women's Ski Jumping USA. "Lawyers think it is worth considering."

Men have been participating in Olympic ski jump since 1924, but the women's event has never been included. After a proposal to add women's ski jump to the 2010 Olympics was denied by the 2006 executive board of the IOC on the grounds that not enough athletes compete in the event, the women took their case to the courts.

The plaintiffs were left dismayed on Friday when Madam Justice Lauri Ann Fenlon ruled that although women ski jumpers had been discriminated against by the International Olympic Committee's decision not to include a women's ski jump event at the 2010 Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver, the Switzerland-based organization was well outside the reach of the Canadian Charts of Rights and Freedoms.

The Vancouver Olympic Committee, the target of the ski jumpers' high-profile lawsuit, is subject to the Charter, but in the case of carrying out and planning the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, Justice Fenlon found the decisions to rest with the IOC - out of VANOC's control.

Since then, Corradini said that she and the other advocates of women's ski jumping have just been trying to wrap their minds around the ruling. "We literally are still absorbing the decision," she said.

While an appeal is only one of the paths that Corradini said the plaintiffs are considering, she still feels the ski jumpers have a case.

"I don't think we'd be discussing it unless we thought there was some validity to having that discussion," Corradini said. "All options are on the table and (an appeal) is one of them."

Corradini said it will take some time to decide on a course of action. With just over six months to the Opening Ceremony of the Games, she still thinks that there is enough time for women's ski jump to be included.

"Since VANOC knew there was a possibility that (inclusion) was going to happen, there was a contingency plan somewhere. And since it's the same venue and all we're asking for is one event, we still have time," Corradini said.

"We're not ready to give up on 2010 yet."

Post a comment

Comments (1)

mystrythng
Jul 11, 2009 | 8:30 PM ET

Appeal? What is there to appeal? You were told you were right, but the group you're going after has no control over it. I don't know what the "other paths" are, but their best bet is to give it up and work on growing the sport enough that IOC agrees for 2014. Let's face it, getting the old men to change their minds about a sport half a year before the games doesn't seem all that likely.
sports_sj_news
;section=news;sport=sj;area=sports;pos=2;tile=2;sz=300x250
sports_sj_news
;section=news;sport=sj;area=sports;pos=5;tile=5;sz=300x250

Special Features